Nickel

A transition metal occupying a central position in this wiki's evidence base. Nickel is toxic and carcinogenic to humans, yet an essential cofactor for pathogen virulence enzymes. It is the most frequent contact allergen worldwide and drives a wide spectrum of systemic disease through dietary exposure. This tension — harmful to the host, beneficial to its invaders — threads through virtually every domain covered by the wiki: from gut metal microbiome ecology and nutritional immunity to metabolic syndrome, nickel allergy, endometriosis, and metal carcinogenesis.

Chemical Properties

  • Transition metal (element 28), most commonly found as Ni(II); atomic weight 58.69; five stable isotopes (58Ni at 68.077%, 60Ni, 61Ni, 62Ni, 64Ni) [1]. Density 8.912 g/cm3; melting point 1455C; boiling point 2913C.
  • Similar ionic radius to Fe(II), allowing it to substitute for iron in enzyme active sites — a key mechanism in its toxicity hypoxic signaling, iron homeostasis disruption [2].
  • Position in the Irving-Williams series (Mn < Fe < Co < Ni < Cu > Zn): nickel binds biological ligands more tightly than iron, cobalt, or manganese, meaning it will preferentially displace these weaker-binding metals from enzyme active sites when concentrations rise — a process called mis metallation [3]. Cells normally prevent this by keeping free nickel at extremely low concentrations, but dietary or environmental loading overwhelms these homeostatic buffers [4].
  • Forms coordination complexes with cysteine, histidine, glutamate, and lysine residues, enabling protein binding and enzyme inhibition [5]. Histidine is a particularly important nickel-chelating amino acid; supplementation with histidine rescues E. coli growth under combined nickel/copper stress by chelating free metal ions extracellularly [6].
  • The fifth most abundant element on Earth [1]. Ubiquitous in environment from both natural processes and anthropogenic activities (fossil fuel combustion, fertilizers, industrial emissions); found in air, water, soil, sediment, and particulate matter [7].
  • Atmospheric levels range from 0.00001-0.003 ug/m3 (remote), 0.003-0.03 ug/m3 (urban), up to 0.07-0.77 ug/m3 (metallurgical areas) [8]; cigarette smoke contains 1.1-3.1 ug Ni per cigarette [9], [5].

Nickel Metabolism and Biomarkers

  • Body burden: approximately 7.3 ug Ni/kg body weight in healthy adults [9].
  • Average dietary intake: 150-350 ug/day in Western diets; potentially higher in plant-based and Indian diets [10], [9]. Beneficial intake estimated at <100 ug/day; most individuals achieve this only because 70 ug/day is typical minimum [1].
  • Absorption: only 1-10% of ingested nickel is absorbed from the GI tract; bioavailability varies by food matrix. Iron deficiency increases nickel absorption via shared DMT-1 (divalent metal transporter-1) pathways [1], [11].
  • Serum levels: 0.2-7 ug/L depending on source; transported bound to nickeloplasmin, albumin, amino acids (especially histidine), and alpha-2-macroglobulin [12], [1].
  • Tissue distribution: nickel accumulates in lungs, thyroid, adrenal glands, brain, kidneys, heart, liver, spleen, and pancreas [1].
  • Urinary nickel (UNi) is the primary biomarker in epidemiological studies; half-life 20-60 hours. Normal urine concentrations <10 ug/L; blood nickel >0.3 ug/L (may exceed 8 ug/L in exposed workers) [1].
  • Sweat nickel can reach 7-270 ug/L (up to 20x plasma levels), explaining why sweating aggravates nickel dermatitis [12].
  • Acute toxicity: oral doses >0.5 g cause poisoning; doses approaching 1 g can be lethal [1].
  • Nickel enters cells via Ca2+ channels, DMT-1 (shared with iron), and phagocytosis of particulate forms [9], [1]. Insoluble nickel particles are phagocytosed based on surface charge — crystalline NiS (negative surface charge, -27 mV) binds cell membranes readily and is phagocytosed at much higher rates than amorphous NiS (positive charge, +9 mV), directly determining carcinogenic potency [13].

Is Nickel Essential for Humans?

Consensus: not proven essential in humans. While animal studies show nickel deprivation causes reduced growth, altered reproduction, impaired iron metabolism, and decreased hematocrit in rats, no nickel-requiring protein has been identified in mammals [9], [14]. Zhang et al. found lower plasma nickel in T2DM patients vs. controls, raising the question [7], but this remains an open area. Nickel may have a role in vitamin B12 metabolism and lipid metabolism in animals, but extrapolation to humans is unwarranted at present.

Evolutionary Context: Nickel as an Ancient Cofactor

Nickel's importance to microbial life is not incidental — it is among the most ancient biologically utilized metals on Earth. Analysis of the palaeo-metallome from 3.33-billion-year-old carbonaceous material in the Barberton greenstone belt reveals that nickel was one of nine bio-functional elements enriched in the earliest known biogenic material, alongside iron, vanadium, and cobalt [15]. The ancient metallome of these Archaean organisms most closely resembles modern anaerobic, methanogenic, or diazotrophic thermophiles — organisms that still depend on nickel-containing enzymes like urease and [NiFe]-hydrogenase. In contrast, zinc and molybdenum are absent from the pre-Great Oxygenation Event (GOE) record, suggesting they became biologically important only after atmospheric oxygenation changed ocean chemistry [15].

This deep evolutionary history explains why nickel-dependent enzymes remain so widespread in prokaryotes: urease, [NiFe]-hydrogenase, nickel-glyoxalase, Ni-SOD, acireductone dioxygenase, and CO-dehydrogenase are relics of a 3.3-billion-year metabolic heritage [14], [4]. The total number of known nickel metalloenzymes is fewer than ten, but they collectively drive global carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen cycles [4]. That mammals abandoned nickel-dependent biochemistry while their microbial pathogens retained it creates the evolutionary asymmetry that makes nutritional immunity possible.

—-

Carcinogenesis

  • IARC Group 1 carcinogen (nickel compounds; metallic nickel is Group 2B) [5].
  • Causes lung and nasal cavity cancers in occupationally exposed workers.
  • Primary carcinogenic mechanism is epigenetic rather than genotoxic: DNA hypermethylation, histone modifications (deacetylation, H3K9 methylation, heterochromatinization at tumor suppressor loci), hypoxic signaling via HIF-1 stabilization [2], [5].
  • Nickel substitutes for Fe2+ in non-heme iron dioxygenases involved in DNA and histone demethylation — a key epigenetic modifications mechanism [5].
  • Acts as a cocarcinogen with UV radiation.
  • Nickel-induced apoptosis occurs through both intrinsic (mitochondrial/Cyt C) and extrinsic (Fas/FasL) pathways, converging on caspase-3/6/7 [5].
  • Can interfere with microRNA networks [5].
  • Genotoxicity: nickel disrupts DNA strands, causes crosslinks, and inhibits DNA repair. In HL-60 leukemia cells, long-term Ni2+ exposure leads to DNA fragmentation, ROS generation, and cell death (preventable by ascorbic acid or N-acetyl-cysteine) [8]. Nickel was the only metal tested to induce DNA damage at concentrations that induced >50% apoptosis (i.e., <0.05 mM) compared to vanadium [8].
  • 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) formation: Ni3S2 significantly increases 8-OH-dG in cultured HeLa cells and elevates testicular lipid peroxides while decreasing antioxidant enzyme activities [8].
  • Nickel stimulates L1 retrotransposition ~2.5-fold, representing a novel genotoxic mechanism via transposon mobilization distinct from direct DNA damage [8].
  • Transcription factor disruption: nickel alters p53, NF-kB, AP-1, TGF-beta, and NF-AT; downregulates p53 and activates c-Myc [8], [1].

Carcinogenicity by Compound

Different nickel compounds have very different carcinogenic potentials, a principle established by Costa's foundational 1982 work demonstrating that phagocytosis is the primary determinant of cell transformation [13], [16]:

  • Crystalline nickel sulfide (NiS): induces morphological transformation at rates 100x higher than amorphous NiS (24% vs. essentially none). Its negative surface charge (-27 mV) enables binding to positively-charged cell membranes, facilitating phagocytosis and intracellular dissolution over 2-3 days [13].
  • Nickel subsulfide (Ni3S2): most carcinogenic in NTP studies — readily endocytized, high solubility in biological fluids. Clear evidence of carcinogenic activity in F344/N rats at 0.6-1.2 mg/m3 [8].
  • Green nickel oxide (NiO): increased alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma or carcinoma in male rats at 0.62-2.5 mg NiO/m3 in 2-year NTP study [8].
  • Nickel sulfate hexahydrate: soluble, rapidly cleared; non-neoplastic lung lesions at >=2.5 mg/m3 but no clear evidence of carcinogenicity [8].
  • Particle clearance is the key determinant: impaired clearance leads to chronic inflammation and tumors. Insoluble compounds (NiS, NiO) are more potent than soluble forms (NiSO4, NiCl2) due to prolonged tissue retention [5].
  • Metallothionein vulnerability: nickel does not potently induce metallothionein (unlike cadmium), meaning the cell's natural chelation defense is not upregulated, potentially enhancing carcinogenic effects [13].

Metallomic Signatures in Cancer

  • Nickel is significantly elevated 1.60-fold in serum of lung cancer patients and 1.37-fold in COPD patients who develop lung cancer, consistent with its role as a pulmonary carcinogen [17].
  • Element ratios involving Ni have higher AUC values in COPD-to-cancer transition patients, suggesting potential as early biomarkers [17].
  • See metallomics for the broader field.

Nickel as a Metalloestrogen

  • Nickel binds ERalpha (noncompetitively) and induces proliferation of ER+ breast cancer cells (2-5 fold at 10^-9 to 10^-6 M) [18].
  • Induces cyclin D1, cyclin E, and cyclin B1 overexpression; causes aneuploidy in human fibroblasts [18].
  • This metalloestrogens activity is relevant to nickel's connections with endometriosis and breast cancer, though epidemiological evidence for Ni-breast cancer is weaker than for cadmium [19], [20].

—-

Mis-metallation and Synergistic Metal Toxicity

Nickel's position in the Irving-Williams series (Mn < Fe < Co < Ni < Cu > Zn) means it binds biological ligands more tightly than iron, cobalt, or manganese [3]. Cells normally prevent mis-metallation by maintaining cytosolic metal availabilities in the inverse order of the Irving-Williams series: weak binders (Mn, Fe) are kept abundant while strong binders (Ni, Cu, Zn) are kept scarce [3], [4]. When this buffering is overwhelmed — by dietary loading, environmental exposure, or immune-mediated metal flooding — nickel displaces iron and manganese from enzyme active sites, rendering them inactive.

A vivid demonstration: MnSOD in escherichia coli is frequently mis-metalated with iron under iron-replete conditions, rendering the superoxide dismutase catalytically inactive because the redox potential is wrong for the Mn active site geometry [3]. By the same logic, nickel can displace iron from iron-sulfur clusters — the molecular machines at the heart of cellular energy metabolism.

Synergistic Toxicity with Copper

Nickel and copper are synergistically toxic at environmentally relevant concentrations where neither metal alone causes significant harm (30 uM Ni + 15 uM Cu) [6]. This matters because nickel and copper frequently co-contaminate freshwater environments (R2 = 0.493 across 239 global water bodies). The combination triggers massive transcriptomic disruption in E. coli: 70% of differentially expressed genes (360/512) are uniquely affected by the combination, not by either metal alone [6].

The central mechanism is iron sulfur clusters disruption: both Cu+ and Ni2+ can displace Fe2+ from Fe-S clusters, but the combination overwhelms the ISC repair/assembly capacity. The cell responds by upregulating ISC assembly genes and sulfur assimilation for new cysteine/Fe-S synthesis [6]. Notably, reactive oxygen species are NOT significantly elevated during Ni/Cu co-exposure under aerobic conditions — the synergistic toxicity operates primarily through Fe-S cluster disruption rather than oxidative stress [6]. This finding challenges the default assumption that metal toxicity always works through ROS.

Nickel and Amyloid-Beta Aggregation

In a striking example of mis-metallation in neurodegeneration, nickel was found to be the most abundant metal contaminant in recombinant amyloid-beta 40 peptide (72.5 mmol/mol) and enhanced Abeta40 aggregation 5.7-fold [21]. While zinc drove the strongest aggregation (14-fold), nickel was previously unrecognized as a contributor. The nickel-specific chelator dimethylglyoxime (DMG) inhibited Abeta40 aggregation by 40-85% in a dose-dependent manner, demonstrating that nickel removal alone — without chelating copper or zinc — substantially reduces pathological aggregation [21]. This selectivity is clinically important because nickel has no known essential function in human physiology, making nickel-specific chelation safer than broad-spectrum approaches. The finding raises questions about how many previous amyloid aggregation studies were unknowingly confounded by trace nickel contamination.

—-

Allergy, SNAS, and the Low-Nickel Diet

Nickel Allergy Overview

  • Most frequent contact allergen worldwide: 8-19% of adults sensitized; 13-18% of females, 3-6% of males [22], [5].
  • See nickel allergy for immunology, regulation, and diagnosis.
  • EU Nickel Directive limits: 0.2 ug/cm2/week for pierced body parts, 0.5 ug/cm2/week for prolonged contact.

Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome (SNAS)

SNAS affects approximately 20% of nickel ACD patients and is the bridge between contact allergy and a vast array of systemic symptoms triggered by dietary nickel [23], [12].

Diagnosis requires:

  1. Positive patch test to nickel.
  2. Symptom improvement on a low-nickel diet.
  3. Positive oral nickel challenge (gold standard: double-blind placebo-controlled) [23], [12].

The BraMa-Ni scoring system offers 94.4% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity for SNAS diagnosis, dramatically outperforming simple forbidden-food lists (51.1%/44.2%). The BraMa-Ni diet is nutritionally balanced at ~50 ug Ni/day [23].

Symptoms of SNAS:

  • Cutaneous (90% of patients): ACD flare-up, widespread eczema, urticaria, angioedema.
  • Gastrointestinal (88%): meteorism, gastric acidity, abdominal colic, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting. Meteorism is the most characteristic GI symptom after oral challenge.
  • 73% report symptoms after a single nickel-rich meal [23].

Immune mechanism: Both Th1 and Th2 pathways involved. IL-5 is the most significantly elevated cytokine within 24 hours of oral challenge. Nickel challenge induces CD4+CD45RO+ cell infiltration in intestinal mucosa with decreased CD8+ cells [12].

Lactose intolerance: 63-74% of SNAS patients have concomitant lactose intolerance, possibly due to nickel-induced brush border enzymatic impairment [12].

> Note: SNAS is not universally recognized in mainstream allergology. Some researchers argue that low-nickel diet benefits may overlap with low-FODMAP diet effects, and the two have not been adequately disentangled in clinical trials.

Allergic Contact Mucositis (Ni ACM)

A specific form of SNAS where dietary nickel triggers IBS-like GI symptoms via TLR4-dependent innate immune response on the gastrointestinal mucosa. Diagnosed by the nickel oral mucosa patch test (Ni omPT) [24], [25].

Hormonal Modulation of Nickel Allergy

  • Nickel contact allergy varies with menstrual cycle phase: patch test reactivity is significantly lower during ovulation (peak estrogen) than during the progestinic phase (p<0.0001). False-negative patch tests may occur during ovulation [26].
  • Oestradiol inhibits cell-mediated (type IV) hypersensitivity by acting on OKT8+ lymphocytes.
  • The strong female predominance in SNAS studies may partly reflect hormonal cycling effects [26].

The Low-Nickel Diet: Therapeutic Evidence

The low-nickel diet is the cornerstone intervention across a remarkable range of conditions:

Dermatitis and eczema:

  • Pioneering 1978 study: 9/17 nickel-sensitive patients with hand eczema improved on low-Ni diet [27].
  • Long-term trial (1993): 64% short-term benefit, 73% sustained improvement at mean 1.8 years follow-up [28].
  • 39% of nickel-sensitive patients with chronic allergic-like dermatopathies (urticaria, angioedema, pruritus) achieved control; confirmed by DBPC oral challenge [29].
  • Low-Ni diet resolved dyshidrosiform pemphigoid in 15 days after dapsone and prednisolone failed [30].
  • Low metal diet (Ni, Cr, Co restricted) plus dental metal elimination improved 67% of metal-sensitive atopic dermatitis patients [31].

IBS and gut symptoms:

  • Low-Ni diet significantly improved all GI symptoms except vomiting in IBS patients with nickel sensitization; intestinal permeability was compromised in all patients (51Cr-EDTA excretion 5.91% vs 2.20% controls) [32].

GERD:

  • Low-Ni diet reduced GERD symptom severity in 95% (19/20) of refractory patients after 8 weeks. Notably, patch test positivity to nickel did NOT predict diet responsiveness — both nickel-positive and nickel-negative patients responded [33].

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS):

  • 45.7% of nickel-sensitive RAS patients had positive oral DBPC challenge; 21/32 improved on nickel-free diet [34].

Helicobacter pylori eradication:

  • Nickel-free diet nearly doubled H. pylori eradication rate when combined with standard triple therapy: 84% vs 46% (p<0.01). The diet starves H. pylori of the nickel required for its urease and hydrogenase virulence enzymes [35].

Gut dysbiosis:

  • Low-Ni diet + targeted probiotics resolved gut dysbiosis in 72.73% of SNAS patients vs 41.38% with diet alone. Fermentative dysbiosis (small intestine, elevated indican) is the predominant type in SNAS (64.71%). Benefits wane 4-6 weeks after treatment cessation [36].

Scoring systems and practical tools:

  • Points-based system: adults should consume no more than 15 points/day; vitamin C (500-1000 mg with meals) reduces nickel absorption [37].
  • Patient awareness is poor: only 37% of self-reported nickel-allergic patients know nickel is in foods [38].

Other SNAS Treatments

Oral hyposensitization (NiOHT):

  • Graduated oral nickel sulphate administration (0.1 ng to 0.1 mg over ~6 months) achieved 69.1% complete remission vs 17.9% in diet-alone controls (NNT = 1.95) [39].
  • A refined protocol at 1.5 ug Ni/week achieved 87% (20/23) sustained symptom freedom with food reintroduction. Mechanistically, NiOHT reduces Ni-induced IFN-gamma (55.3%), IL-13 (58.6%), and IL-5 (31.2%) [40].

Disulfiram chelation:

  • Disulfiram (nickel-chelating agent) combined with low-Ni diet achieved 90.9% complete clearance of chronic vesicular hand eczema at 4 weeks (vs 10% placebo). Disulfiram metabolite diethyldithiocarbamate forces nickel excretion through urine, bile, and sweat [41].

—-

Nickel and Endometriosis

A striking connection has emerged between nickel sensitivity and endometriosis:

  • 90.3% Ni ACM prevalence in endometriosis patients with GI symptoms (Ni omPT positive). A 3-month low-Ni diet significantly improved all 15 gastrointestinal symptoms, all 7 extra-intestinal symptoms, and gynecological symptoms (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain) [25].
  • Nickel may act as a metalloestrogen in endometriosis, binding estrogen receptors and promoting proliferation of estrogen-responsive tissue [25].
  • Peritoneal fluid nickel elevated 4:1 in a vegetarian endometriosis patient compared to controls (40.4 ug/L vs <LOD). The patient's vegetarian diet (high in tomatoes, nuts, legumes) was the likely exposure route [42].
  • Paradox: vegetarian diets frequently adopted for endometriosis management may increase nickel exposure through high consumption of plant-based, high-nickel foods [42].

—-

Nickel, Obesity, and Metabolic Disruption

Nickel Allergy and Overweight

  • 59.7% nickel allergy prevalence in overweight females (BMI >26), dramatically higher than 12.5% in the general female population (p<0.001) [43].
  • A normocaloric low-Ni diet reduced BMI by 4.2 (31.6 to 27.4), body fat by 5.1%, and waist circumference by 11.7 cm over 6 months in nickel-allergic overweight women [43].
  • Proposed mechanisms: nickel induces insulin-like actions, glycogenolysis, hyperglycemia; IL-17 from nickel-specific T cells is upregulated in obesity; estrogen deficiency at menopause may amplify nickel-mediated Th17 responses [43].

Nickel and Diabetes

  • Meta-analysis of 20 studies (46,071 participants): urinary nickel shows a weak but positive association with diabetes risk (pooled SMD 0.16, p<0.01). Blood nickel does not show significant association [44].
  • Proposed mechanisms: increased hepatic glycogenolysis, heightened pancreatic glucagon release, reduced glucose utilization, elevated inducible nitric oxide synthase [44].
  • NHANES data links urinary nickel independently with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, with insulin resistance mediating ~73.69% of the association [45].

Nickel and Thyroid Function

  • Dose-response relationship exists between blood nickel and thyroid hormone parameters (TSH, fT4, fT3, SPINA-GT, SPINA-GD) [46].
  • Males appear more susceptible: significant correlations found only in males for Ni vs fT4 (p=0.039) and Ni vs SPINA-GT (p=0.013). At blood Ni levels of 1.36-60.9 ug/L, 78.68% of men may be at 10% higher risk of thyroid function alterations [46].
  • Mechanism: oxidative stress (reducing glutathione, SOD activity) and perturbation of apoptosis-related proteins in thyroid tissue [46].

Nickel, Fertilizers, and the Obesity Epidemic

  • Nickel in urea fertilizers increased from ~0.3 to >3.5 mg/kg from the 1970s through 1990s, temporally aligned with the US obesity epidemic. This is proposed as a "permissive upstream factor" that primed populations for metabolic dysfunction by disrupting gut metal microbiome ecology [45].

—-

Nickel and Chronic Fatigue / Fibromyalgia

  • 52% of 204 women with chronic fatigue and muscle pain had positive history of nickel contact dermatitis [47].
  • Nickel allergy significantly impacted treatment response: only 16% of allergic patients were good responders to Staphylococcus vaccine therapy vs 37% of non-allergic patients (p<0.001) [47].
  • Among allergic smokers (cigarette smoke contains trace nickel), only 6% responded, suggesting synergistic worsening [47].
  • Case reports document improvement after low-Ni diet and smoking cessation [47].

—-

Cardiovascular and Renal Effects

Cardiac Toxicity

  • Potentially associated with CVD and metabolic syndrome, but evidence is inconclusive at low doses in humans [7].
  • NHANES studies show associations between urinary nickel and various metabolic outcomes, but different studies using the same database reach contradictory conclusions [7].
  • Animal evidence is stronger and mechanistically detailed: nickel exposure (100 mg Ni/L as NiSO4 in drinking water) significantly increases cardiac lipoperoxide and total lipid concentrations, serum cholesterol (+59%), LDH (+64%), and ALT (+30%) — markers of myocardial damage [48]. The primary mechanism is superoxide radical accumulation: cardiac SOD is significantly decreased while catalase and GSH-Px are unchanged, indicating that the superoxide anion itself (not H2O2) is the primary damaging species [48]. Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) reversed all biochemical parameters to near-control values in 15 days [48].

Renal Toxicity

  • Even at low doses, nickel has potential to cause significant kidney damage; exposure can progress from acute injury to acute tubulointerstitial nephritis to CKD and ESRD [1].
  • Heavy metal exposure (including nickel from soil contamination) associated with CKD progression to ESRD [49].
  • Urinary metals including nickel studied in relation to kidney function biomarkers [50], [51].

Hepatotoxicity

  • Excessive nickel intake causes liver damage in animal models: increased AST, ALT; long-term exposure increases risk of liver cirrhosis through lipid peroxidation, reduced hepatic glutathione levels, and nickel accumulation [1].

—-

Neurotoxicity

  • Chronic low-dose nickel causes anxiety, depression, and memory impairment in rats via hippocampal oxidative stress [52].
  • Crosses BBB, accumulates in cerebral cortex; disrupts dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, GABA, and NMDA receptors. Ni2+ can release dopamine and inhibit glutamate receptors [1].
  • Nickel inhibits Cob(I)alamin adenosyltransferase (vitamin B12 metabolism) with 50% loss at 100 uM Ni2+, potentially linking to neurological effects of B12 deficiency [5].

Alzheimer's Disease

  • Nickel promotes amyloid beta aggregation 5.7-fold and is the most abundant metal contaminant in recombinant Abeta40 (72.5 mmol/mol) [21]. The nickel-specific chelator DMG inhibited aggregation 40-85%, suggesting nickel removal as a therapeutic target distinct from the well-studied copper and zinc chelation approaches (see Mis-metallation section above).
  • Included in reviews of dietary heavy metals and neurodegeneration [53], [54].

Parkinson's Disease

  • Nickel exposure is associated with increased risk of parkinsons disease, with the gut microbiome mediating part of the association [55]. Nickel alters the abundance of specific bacterial taxa implicated in PD: pro-inflammatory Enterobacteriaceae are enriched while SCFA-producing commensals are depleted [55].
  • Nickel-dependent bacterial enzymes (urease, hydrogenase) in gut pathogens contribute to dysbiosis and ammonia-mediated epithelial damage, compounding iron-driven ferroptosis in dopaminergic neurons [56]. The nickel-microbiome-neurodegeneration axis represents a specific instance of the broader metal dyshomeostasis framework for PD, where metal exposure reshapes gut ecology which in turn drives neuroinflammation through the gut brain axis [57].
  • See nickel neurotoxicity for details.

—-

Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity

  • Maternal nickel exposure associated with congenital heart defects (aOR 1.326 for highest hair Ni tertile) [58].
  • Pregnancy complications (GDM, HDCP) weaken placental barrier to nickel [59].
  • Teratogenic in animal models: nickel carbonyl [Ni(CO)4] and nickel sulfide [Ni3S2] cause fetal malformations including cystic lung, exencephaly, anophthalmia, cleft palate, microphthalmia, hydrocephaly, exophthalmia, and skeletal defects [5], [1].
  • Male reproductive toxicity: nickel disrupts sperm vitality and affects zinc-dependent metabolism essential for sperm quality; nickel-containing binding proteins act as DNA-binding proteins affecting spermatogenesis [1]. Nickel's role in male infertility is part of the broader heavy metals-infertility connection [60], [61].
  • Pancreatic effects: acute and subchronic nickel exposure increases blood glucose and impairs insulin secretion — relevant to gestational diabetes risk [1].
  • Tampons contain nickel in 100% of tested samples (GM 80.1 ng/g), representing an underrecognized mucosal exposure route for reproductive-age women [62].
  • See nickel reproductive toxicity for details.

—-

Nickel in Baby Food and Children

Children are a particularly vulnerable population due to immature detoxification systems and higher food intake relative to body weight [63].

  • 91.8% of commercial baby foods contain nickel (up to 225.7 ug/kg); worst-case EDI may reach 497% of TDI in 2-year-olds [64].
  • Organic baby foods paradoxically have higher nickel: 100% detection, 54.7 ug/kg vs 35.8 ug/kg in non-organic (p=0.015) [64].
  • In France, up to 98% of children aged 1-36 months exceed TDI under upper-bound assumptions; chocolate/cocoa accounts for 10% of mean daily intake in children [63].
  • Soy-based infant formula contains ~10x more nickel than cow's milk formula (0.45 vs 0.03 mg/L) and orders of magnitude more than human breast milk (0.005-0.016 mg/L) [65].
  • Children near industrial areas have elevated urinary nickel correlated with markers of oxidative stress [63].
  • EFSA TDI: 13 ug/kg body weight/day (with a more protective 2.8 ug/kg b.w./day value previously in use). No maximum residue level for nickel in baby food exists [64].
  • German infant formula study and Italian baby food analyses confirm nickel as a ubiquitous contaminant [66], [67], [68], [69].

Nickel as a Catalytic Driver of NEC in Preterm Infants

  • Dietary nickel from infant formula may be a critical but overlooked contributor to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) pathogenesis [65].
  • Key NEC-associated pathogens (E. coli, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Ureaplasma) all rely on nickel-dependent enzymes: urease, hydrogenase, glyoxalase.
  • Excess dietary nickel creates a positive feedback loop: Ni-fueled urease raises gut pH, favoring Proteobacteria over acid-producing commensals.
  • Human breast milk is naturally nickel-poor — potentially an evolved nutritional immunity mechanism starving Ni-dependent pathogens of their essential cofactor [65].
  • Proposed biomarkers: fecal urease activity, ammonia levels, and stool nickel content as early NEC risk indicators [65].

—-

Dietary Nickel Exposure

Food is the primary exposure route for the general population. See dietary nickel exposure for full coverage.

Highest-Nickel Foods (ug per serving)

FoodNickel (ug/serving)Source
TVP (100g)251[70]
Scallops (100g)176[70]
Pecans (30g)170[70]
Cashews (30g)166[70]
Mussels (125g)154[38]
Spirulina (30g)151[38]
Clams (8g)136[70]
Soy yogurt (175g)108[70]
Tofu (85g)102[70]
Buckwheat raw (45g)99[70]
Walnuts (30g)100[70]

Lowest-Nickel Foods (safe choices)

Dairy products (cream, butter, cheese), eggs, most meats (especially poultry with skin removed), white rice, refined flour, apple, eggplant, olive oil, sugar, honey [37], [70].

Cereal Grains as a Source

Roasted buckwheat (2.53 mg/kg), millet (4.80 mg/kg), oat flakes (1.81 mg/kg), and bran are the highest-nickel grain products. Rye (0.10 mg/kg) is lowest [71].

Reference Dietary Data

  • Danish average diet: ~150 ug/day; roots/vegetables contribute 43.2% of intake [10].
  • Cocoa has the highest nickel concentration of any common food: 3.0-12 ug/g [10], up to 17.1 mg/kg [63].

—-

Nickel and Microbial Pathogenesis

The Paradox

Mammals do not synthesize known Ni-requiring proteins, yet nickel is essential for key virulence factors in numerous human pathogens [14]. This creates an opportunity for nutritional immunity — the host can restrict nickel without harming its own enzymes.

Key Ni-Enzymes

Staphylopine: A Broad-Spectrum Nickel Metallophore

staphylococcus aureus acquires nickel primarily through the staphylopine metallophore system (Cnt), a nicotianamine-like molecule synthesized by CntKLM enzymes and exported by CntE. Staphylopine chelates nickel alongside zinc and cobalt extracellularly and is reimported as metal-staphylopine complexes via the CntABCDF transporter [72]. This system is particularly important in calprotectin-rich abscess environments where free metal concentrations are extremely low. Nickel is required as cofactor for S. aureus urease, which is critical for skin survival (human sweat contains ~22 mM urea) and kidney colonization [72].

Nickel, Biofilm, and Antibiotic Co-Selection

A particularly concerning aspect of nickel's ecological impact is its ability to co-select for antibiotic resistance — a phenomenon where nickel exposure simultaneously drives resistance to clinical antibiotics through shared genetic or regulatory mechanisms [73].

  • Sub-inhibitory concentrations of nickel (62.5-250 ug/mL) induce antibiotic resistance in S. aureus, while high concentrations (500-1000 ug/mL) paradoxically increase antibiotic sensitivity. Bacteria adapted to moderate nickel (250 ug/mL) show the highest adhesion, highest biofilm formation, and greatest resistance to five tested antibiotics [74]. This non-linear dose-response means that low-level chronic nickel exposure — the range most likely encountered from diet and consumer products — is the most dangerous for resistance selection.
  • Nickel released from orthodontic NiTi archwires (up to 40 ug/day) may create precisely these sub-inhibitory concentrations in the oral cavity [74].
  • In agricultural soils, long-term nickel contamination increased the diversity and abundance of 149 unique antibiotic resistance genes spanning virtually every clinically relevant class (multidrug, beta-lactam, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, vancomycin) [75]. The integrase gene intI1 was the most connected node in resistance gene networks, mediating horizontal gene transfer from nickel-resistant organisms to other bacteria [75].
  • Three distinct molecular mechanisms underlie co-selection: (1) co-resistance (physical linkage of metal and antibiotic resistance genes on the same plasmid or transposon), (2) cross-resistance (shared efflux pumps that expel both metals and antibiotics), and (3) co-regulatory mechanisms (shared transcriptional responses) [73]. Unlike antibiotics, metals are not degradable and represent a permanent selection pressure in contaminated environments [73].

Nickel and the Gut Microbiome

  • Heavy metals including nickel selectively eliminate beneficial SCFA-producing bacteria (roseburia, faecalibacterium prausnitzii, bifidobacterium) while enriching metal-tolerant pathogenic species [45], [76].
  • Nickel exposure causes a disturbed Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio, decreased Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, mirroring the dysbiosis patterns seen across SNAS, obesity, and neurodegeneration [77].
  • Nickel disrupts gut barrier integrity by affecting tight junction proteins; mechanisms parallel those documented for other heavy metals [78].
  • Probiotic metal detoxification: in an RCT of 152 occupational workers, probiotic yogurt containing Pediococcus acidilactici GR-1 reduced blood nickel by 38.34% (from 4.855 to 2.994 ug/L, p<0.0001) after 12 weeks, while enriching Blautia species and increasing fecal SCFA production [79]. This is the first human RCT demonstrating probiotic-mediated reduction of blood nickel levels.
  • Additional probiotic strategies for metal detoxification reviewed in [80], [81], [82].
  • See gut metal microbiome for the broader context.

—-

Nickel and Autoimmune / Inflammatory Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

  • In a case-control study (52 MS patients vs. 41 controls), urinary nickel was significantly elevated in MS patients and emerged as a significant risk factor (OR 1.47) [83]. Sialic acid, which binds toxic metals like nickel with high affinity, was dramatically elevated (OR 14.23), suggesting ongoing metal-induced tissue damage [83].
  • Iron was protective (OR 0.52), consistent with lower Fe levels in MS patients and the nutritional immunity interpretation where low serum iron may reflect host defense rather than deficiency [83].
  • Poor bowel habits increased MS risk 4.76-fold, supporting the gut brain axis involvement in metal-mediated MS pathology [83].

IBD

  • Trace metal biomarkers including nickel studied in IBD patients [84].

PCOS

  • Nickel measured in erythrocytes, serum, and hair of PCOS patients across multiple studies [85], [86], [87], [88].

Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Nickel levels measured alongside other metals in RA patients [89], [90].

ASD and Neurodevelopment

  • Metal profiles (including nickel) are studied in ASD; trace metal imbalance is proposed as a primary pathology [91].
  • Metal dyshomeostasis drives overlapping gut pathologies in ASD (intestinal barrier dysfunction, dysbiosis, inflammation) — nickel is notably absent from focused reviews but its gut effects parallel those of studied metals [92].

Depression

  • Urinary nickel among metals associated with behavioral depression in women [93].

—-

Environmental and Regulatory Context

  • EU Drinking Water Directive sets nickel limit at 20 ug/L [94].
  • EFSA TDI: 13 ug/kg b.w./day (2020); previous value 2.8 ug/kg b.w./day.
  • No maximum residue level for nickel in baby food [64].
  • Soil concentrations: background 3-1000 ppm; near nickel-producing industries, soils can reach 9,000 ppm [8]. Intensive urea-fertilizer regions show 35-85 mg/kg vs. background of 20-30 mg/kg [95].
  • Water: rivers typically 0.3 ppb; seawater 0.5-2 ppb; drinking water <10 ug/L contributes 7.5-15.0 ug daily intake [1].
  • Nickel contamination documented in fruit juices [96], [97], [98], leafy vegetables [99], and fish products note evaluation risk ptes italy fish products.
  • Stainless steel cookware can elevate nickel content in food during cooking [1].
  • Phytoremediation: hyperaccumulator plants (Alyssum murale, Sebertia acuminata) accumulate >1000 mg Ni/kg dry weight [5].

Nickel in Fertilizers and Agricultural Contamination

Nickel content in urea fertilizers increased from ~0.3 to >3.5 mg/kg from the 1970s through 1990s, driven by industrial scaling of urea production [95]. Nickel plays a dual role in urea fertilizers: it is an essential cofactor for the urease enzyme (catalyzing urea hydrolysis in soil), while being toxic to plants and soil microorganisms at elevated concentrations. Optimal nickel concentrations (0.25-0.5 ppm) increase plant growth, but higher levels (>1-2 ppm) produce toxicity [95].

Post-2000 regulatory frameworks reduced metal concentrations in newly manufactured fertilizers, but legacy contamination persists in soils — nickel residence time is shorter than cadmium (20-40 years) or lead (100-200 years), but still represents decades of accumulated burden [95]. South Asian agricultural systems (India, Bangladesh, Pakistan) face the highest contamination burden, with 51-72% of soils moderately to highly contaminated [95].

The downstream consequence is that nickel-contaminated soils harbor bacteria with elevated antibiotic resistance gene profiles (149 unique ARGs detected), and these resistant organisms may transfer to humans through the food chain [75].

Nickel Poisoning: Clinical Management

For acute nickel poisoning, chelation therapy with DDC (diethyldithiocarbamate) is the primary treatment; DDC forms a lipophilic chelate with divalent nickel facilitating excretion through urine, bile, and sweat [1]. Disulfiram is metabolized to two DDC molecules and provides 70% protection against nickel carbonyl poisoning (DDC provides 100%). The dimethylglyoxime (DMG) spot test produces a characteristic pink/violet color for nickel detection in biological fluids [1].

—-

Open Questions

  1. Low-dose effects: no animal studies exist at UNi-equivalent doses <6.1 ug/L — a critical gap. The environmental concentrations that matter most to human health remain unstudied [7].
  2. Nickel sequestration as therapy: could targeting nickel availability combat infections without disrupting the microbiome? Aspergillomarasmine A is a candidate nickel chelator; DMG (dimethylglyoxime) has demonstrated selectivity for nickel over other biologically relevant metals [65], [21].
  3. Synergistic metal mixtures: nickel and copper are synergistically toxic through Fe-S cluster disruption at concentrations where neither alone causes harm [6]. Nickel levels also correlate with zinc, vanadium, chromium — combined exposures may matter more than individual metals [91]. Current risk assessment based on single-metal models systematically underestimates real-world hazard.
  4. SNAS beyond patch-test-positive patients: the GERD study finding that patch-test-negative patients respond to low-Ni diet challenges the standard diagnostic framework [33]. Could nickel sensitivity be far more prevalent than contact allergy testing suggests?
  5. Vegetarian diet paradox: plant-based diets frequently adopted for health may increase nickel exposure and exacerbate conditions like endometriosis in susceptible individuals [42].
  6. Breast milk as nutritional immunity: is the low nickel content of breast milk an evolved defense against Ni-dependent pathogens in the infant gut? [65].
  7. NEC prevention: could monitoring formula nickel content or supplementing with nickel-chelating agents reduce NEC incidence in preterm infants? [65].
  8. Nickel-Alzheimer's link: does nickel promote Abeta42 aggregation (the more pathogenic species) to the same degree as Abeta40? What are nickel concentrations in Alzheimer's brain tissue compared to age-matched controls? Do gut bacteria that accumulate nickel (e.g., H. pylori) influence systemic nickel exposure and AD risk? [21].
  9. Antibiotic resistance amplification: how much of the global antibiotic resistance crisis is driven by environmental nickel contamination in agricultural soils selecting for multi-drug resistant organisms that then enter the human food chain? [75].
  10. Gut-brain axis mediation: does nickel-driven gut dysbiosis causally contribute to Parkinson's disease via the microbiome-neuroinflammation pathway, or is the association confounded by co-exposure to other metals? [55].
  11. Environmental thyroid disruption: heavy metals including nickel have never been systematically tested as potential thyroid carcinogens; the dose and duration that may be harmful are undefined [100].

—-

Key Sources

Foundational nickel biochemistry and toxicology:

  • [14] — definitive review of nickel in microbial virulence
  • [5] — comprehensive nickel toxicology review
  • [9] — nickel essentiality debate and metabolism
  • [1] — most current (2025) intoxication mechanisms and clinical management
  • [13] — foundational structure-activity carcinogenesis
  • [8] — mechanistic carcinogenesis review (NTP data, HIF-1, epigenetics)
  • [3] — Irving-Williams series and mis-metallation framework
  • [4] — bacterial metallostasis and metalloproteome

Nickel-microbiome interaction:

  • [65] — nickel as catalytic driver of NEC
  • [77] — nickel effects on intestinal microbiota
  • [55] — nickel-PD link via gut microbiome
  • [79] — first human RCT of probiotic nickel reduction
  • [72] — staphylopine metallophore system

Nickel and disease associations:

  • [21] — nickel promotes amyloid-beta aggregation
  • [6] — synergistic Ni/Cu toxicity via Fe-S cluster disruption
  • [48] — cardiac toxicity via superoxide
  • [83] — nickel as MS risk factor

Environmental and agricultural contamination:

  • [75] — nickel drives 149 ARGs in agricultural soils
  • [73] — co-selection framework
  • [74] — sub-inhibitory nickel drives resistance and biofilm
  • [95] — nickel in urea fertilizers 1960-2025
  • [15] — 3.33-billion-year evolutionary context

Additional supporting sources:

Connections

Metals:

  • arsenic, chromium, cadmium, lead, mercury — co-reviewed toxic metals
  • zinc — zinc deficiency and nickel exposure produce overlapping pathologies; Ni displaces Zn from enzyme active sites per Irving-Williams series
  • iron — nickel substitutes for Fe(II) in key enzymes; synergistic Fe-S cluster disruption with copper
  • copper — synergistically toxic with nickel through Fe-S cluster disruption at individually non-toxic concentrations
  • manganese — nickel outcompetes Mn for enzyme binding sites per Irving-Williams series

Organisms:

  • helicobacter pylori — the pathogen most dependent on nickel; eradication enhanced by low-Ni diet
  • staphylococcus aureus — acquires nickel via staphylopine metallophore; urease essential for skin survival
  • escherichia coli — model organism for Ni/Cu synergistic toxicity; nickel-dependent glyoxalase I

Mechanisms and Concepts:

  • mis metallation — nickel displaces weaker-binding metals from enzyme active sites per Irving-Williams series
  • iron sulfur clusters — primary target of combined Ni/Cu toxicity
  • oxidative stress — mechanism in toxicity, pathogen defense, neurotoxicity, and thyroid disruption
  • epigenetic modifications — primary carcinogenic pathway (DNA methylation, histone modifications)
  • nutritional immunity — host defense exploiting nickel scarcity in mammals
  • co selection — nickel contamination drives antibiotic resistance in soils and oral biofilms
  • amyloid beta — nickel promotes Abeta40 aggregation 5.7-fold; DMG chelator inhibits
  • ferroptosis — nickel-driven dysbiosis compounds iron-dependent lipid peroxidation in neurodegeneration

Clinical:

Disease associations:

References (143)

  1. Rafati Rahimzadeh M, Rafati Rahimzadeh M, Kazemi S et al. (2025). Nickel; A Metal with Threats to Human Health, Focusing on Its Intoxication Mechanisms. Human and Experimental Toxicology. doi:10.1177/09603271251361197
  2. Konstantin Salnikov, Anatoly Zhitkovich (2008). Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms in Metal Carcinogenesis and Cocarcinogenesis: Nickel, Arsenic, and Chromium. Chemical Research in Toxicology. doi:10.1021/tx700198a
  3. Nigel J. Robinson, Andrea Glasfeld (2020). Robinson & Glasfeld 2020 — Metalation and Mis-metalation: Nature's Challenge in Metal Coordination. Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry. doi:10.1007/s00775-020-01790-3
  4. Daiana A. Capdevila, Johnma J. Rondon, Katherine A. Edmonds et al. (2024). Capdevila 2024 — Bacterial Metallostasis: Metal Sensing, Metalloproteome Remodeling, and Metal Trafficking. Chemical Reviews. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00264
  5. Genchi G, Carocci A, Lauria G et al. (2020). Genchi 2020 — Nickel: Human Health and Environmental Toxicology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:10.3390/ijerph17030679
  6. Linda Darwiche, Carlos A Rodriguez-Bornot, Rebecca A Ingrassia et al. (2025). Darwiche 2025 — The Molecular Basis of the Synergistic Toxicity of Nickel and Copper, Common Environmental Co-Contaminants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
  7. ★Yucheng Liu, Xiaomin Luo, Yongde Peng et al. (2025). Cardio-Metabolic Effects of Nickel: A Narrative Review. Cardiovascular Toxicology. doi:10.1007/s12012-025-10014-6
  8. Cameron KS, Buchner V, Tchounwou PB (2011). Cameron 2011 — Nickel Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity. Reviews on Environmental Health. doi:10.1515/reveh.2011.012
  9. Denkhaus E, Salnikov K (2002). Nickel essentiality, toxicity, and carcinogenicity. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. doi:10.1016/s1040-8428(01)00214-1
  10. Flyvholm MA, Nielsen GD, Andersen A (1984). Nickel Content of Food and Estimation of Dietary Intake. Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung. doi:10.1007/BF01043419
  11. ★Monisha Jaishankar, Tenzin Tseten, Naresh Anbalagan et al. (2014). Toxicity, Mechanism and Health Effects of Some Heavy Metals. Interdisciplinary Toxicology. doi:10.2478/intox-2014-0009
  12. Di Gioacchino M, Gatta A, Della Valle L et al. (2018). Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome. Metal Allergy (book chapter)
  13. Costa M, Heck JD (1982). Specific Nickel Compounds as Carcinogens. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences (TIPS)
  14. ★Robert J. Maier, Stéphane L. Benoit (2019). Role of Nickel in Microbial Pathogenesis. Inorganics. doi:10.3390/inorganics7070080
  15. Hickman-Lewis K, Cavalazzi B, Sorieul S et al. (2020). Metallomics in deep time and the influence of ocean chemistry on the metabolic landscapes of Earth's earliest ecosystems. Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61774-w
  16. Oller AR, Costa M, Oberdörster G (1997). Carcinogenicity Assessment of Selected Nickel Compounds. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. doi:10.1006/taap.1996.8075
  17. Belen Callejon-Leblic, Saida Sanchez Espirilla, Carolina Gotera-Rivera et al. (2023). Metallomic Signatures of Lung Cancer and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. doi:10.3390/ijms241814250
  18. ★Aquino NB, Sevigny MB, Sabangan J et al. (2012). Role of Cadmium and Nickel in Estrogen Receptor Signaling and Breast Cancer: Metalloestrogens or Not?. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part C - Environmental Carcinogenesis and Ecotoxicology Reviews. doi:10.1080/10590501.2012.705159
  19. ★Ali AS, Nazar ME, Mustafa RM et al. (2024). Impact of heavy metals on breast cancer (Review). World Academy of Sciences Journal
  20. ★Liu L, Chen J, Liu C et al. (2022). Relationships Between Biological Heavy Metals and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Nutrition. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.838869
  21. Benoit, S.L., Bhatt et al. (2021). Benoit & Maier 2021 — Nickel Chelator Inhibits Amyloid-Beta Aggregation. Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86060-1
  22. Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Wennervaldt M et al. (2019). Nickel Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis: A Clinical Review. Contact Dermatitis. doi:10.1111/cod.13327
  23. Braga M, Quecchia C, Perotta C et al. (2013). Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome: Nosologic Framework and Usefulness of Diet Regimen for Diagnosis. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology. doi:10.1177/039463201302600314
  24. Borghini R, De Amicis N, Bella A et al. (2020). Beneficial Effects of a Low-Nickel Diet on Relapsing IBS-Like and Extraintestinal Symptoms of Celiac Patients during a Proper Gluten-Free Diet. Nutrients. doi:10.3390/nu12082277
  25. Borghini R, Porpora MG, Casale R et al. (2020). Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Like Disorders in Endometriosis: Prevalence of Nickel Sensitivity and Effects of a Low-Nickel Diet. An Open-Label Pilot Study. Nutrients. doi:10.3390/nu12082277
  26. Bonamonte D, Foti C, Antelmi AR et al. (2005). Nickel contact allergy and menstrual cycle. Contact Dermatitis. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00588.x
  27. Kaaber K, Veien NK, Tjell JC (1978). Low nickel diet in the treatment of patients with chronic nickel dermatitis. British Journal of Dermatology. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1978.tb01622.x
  28. Veien NK, Hattel T, Laurberg G (1993). Low nickel diet: An open, prospective trial. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. doi:10.1016/0190-9622(93)70154-L
  29. Antico A, Soana R (1999). Chronic Allergic-Like Dermatopathies in Nickel-Sensitive Patients. Results of Dietary Restrictions and Challenge with Nickel Salts. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings. doi:10.2500/108854199778338991
  30. Atakan N, Tuzun J, Karaduman A (1993). Dyshidrosiform pemphigoid induced by nickel in the diet. Contact Dermatitis. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1993.tb03520.x
  31. Adachi A, Horikawa T, Takashima T et al. (1997). Potential Efficacy of Low Metal Diets and Dental Metal Elimination in the Management of Atopic Dermatitis: An Open Clinical Study. The Journal of Dermatology. doi:10.1111/j.1346-8138.1997.tb02732.x
  32. Rizzi A, Nucera E, Laterza L et al. (2017). Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Nickel Allergy: What Is the Role of the Low Nickel Diet?. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. doi:10.5056/jnm16027
  33. Yousaf A, Hagen R, Mitchell M et al. (2021). The effect of a low-nickel diet and nickel sensitization on gastroesophageal reflux disease: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. doi:10.1007/s12664-020-01090-3
  34. Pacor ML, Di Lorenzo G, Martinelli N et al. (2003). Results of Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Challenge with Nickel Salts in Patients Affected by Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. doi:10.1159/000072142
  35. Campanale M, Nucera E, Ojetti V et al. (2014). Nickel Free-Diet Enhances the Helicobacter pylori Eradication Rate: A Pilot Study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. doi:10.1007/s10620-014-3060-3
  36. Lombardi F, Fiasca F, Minelli M et al. (2020). The Effects of Low-Nickel Diet Combined with Oral Administration of Selected Probiotics on Patients with Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome (SNAS) and Gut Dysbiosis. Nutrients
  37. Mislankar M, Zirwas MJ (2013). Low-Nickel Diet Scoring System for Systemic Nickel Allergy. Dermatitis. doi:10.1097/DER.0b013e3182937e81
  38. Bergman D, Goldenberg A, Rundle C et al. (2016). Low Nickel Diet: A Patient-Centered Review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dermatology Research. doi:10.4172/2155-9554.1000356
  39. Schiavino D, Nucera E, Alonzi C et al. (2006). A Clinical Trial of Oral Hyposensitization in Systemic Allergy to Nickel. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology. doi:10.1177/039463200601900120
  40. Minelli M, Schiavino D, Musca F et al. (2010). Oral Hyposensitization to Nickel Induces Clinical Improvement and a Decrease in TH1 and TH2 Cytokines in Patients with Systemic Nickel Allergy Syndrome. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology. doi:10.1177/039463201002300117
  41. Sharma AD (2006). Disulfiram and low nickel diet in the management of hand eczema: A clinical study. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. doi:10.4103/0378-6323.25777
  42. Lopez-Botella A, Gomez-Torres MJ, Sanchez R et al. (2023). Elevated Lead, Nickel, and Bismuth Levels in the Peritoneal Fluid of a Peritoneal Endometriosis Patient without Toxic Habits or Occupational Exposure following a Vegetarian Diet. Toxics. doi:10.3390/toxics11040389
  43. Lusi EA, Di Ciommo VM, Patrissi T et al. (2015). High Prevalence of Nickel Allergy in an Overweight Female Population: A Pilot Observational Analysis. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123265
  44. Lu H, Shi X, Han L et al. (2024). Association between nickel exposure and diabetes risk: an updated meta-analysis of observational studies. Frontiers in Public Health. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1463880
  45. ★Karen Pendergrass (2026). Heavy Metals, Microbial Metallomics, and the US Obesity Epidemic: A Mechanistic Examination of a Population-Level Metabolic Disruption. Zenodo Preprint. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18434951
  46. Maric D, Baralic K, Javorac D et al. (2023). Nickel as a potential disruptor of thyroid function: benchmark modelling of human data. Frontiers in Endocrinology. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1145153
  47. Regland B, Zachrisson O, Stejskal V et al. (2001). Nickel Allergy Is Found in a Majority of Women with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Muscle Pain - And May Be Triggered by Cigarette Smoke and Dietary Nickel Intake. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.746060
  48. Novelli ELB, Diniz YS, Almeida JA et al. (2000). Toxic Mechanism of Nickel Exposure on Cardiac Tissue. Toxic Substance Mechanisms
  49. Tsai CC, Wu CL, Kor CT et al. (2018). Prospective associations between environmental heavy metal exposure and renal outcomes in adults with chronic kidney disease. Nephrology. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.107065
  50. Xie S, Perrais M, Golshayan D et al. (2025). Association between urinary heavy metal/trace element concentrations and kidney function: a prospective study. Clinical Kidney Journal. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfae399
  51. Sabath E, Robles-Osorio ML (2012). Renal health and the environment: heavy metal nephrotoxicity. Nefrologia. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000013121
  52. Lamtai M, Azirar S, Zghari O et al. (2018). Effect of Chronic Administration of Nickel on Affective and Cognitive Behavior in Male and Female Rats. Brain Sciences. doi:10.3390/brainsci8080141
  53. ★Guevara-Ramirez P, Tamayo-Trujillo R, Cadena-Ullauri S et al. (2024). Heavy metals in the diet: unraveling the molecular pathways linked to neurodegenerative disease risk. Food and Agricultural Immunology
  54. ★Giasuddin Ahmed, Md. Shiblur Rahaman, Enrique Perez et al. (2025). Associations of Environmental Exposure to Arsenic, Manganese, Lead and Cadmium on Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Recent Evidence from Mechanistic Studies. Preprints.org (not peer-reviewed)
  55. Wei Ji, Chen Yang, Zhigang Liu (2025). Ji 2025 -- Nickel Exposure and Parkinson's Disease Risk: Gut Microbiome Mediation. npj Parkinson's Disease. doi:10.1038/s41531-025-00950-z
  56. ★Karen Pendergrass (2025). Microbial Metallomics and Parkinson's Disease: A Unified Metal-Driven Framework Linking Ferroptosis, Dysbiosis, and alpha-Synuclein Pathology. Conference Presentation. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17830083
  57. Karen Pendergrass (2025). Pendergrass 2025 — From Dysbiosis to Dyshomeostasis: Why Parkinson's Requires a Metallomic–Microbiome Lens. Zenodo Preprint. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18068369
  58. Zhang N, Chen W, Dong Y et al. (2019). Metal nickel exposure increase the risk of congenital heart defects occurrence in offspring. Medicine. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000015352
  59. Ding R, Ruan Y, He X et al. (2021). Pregnancy complications effect on the nickel content in maternal blood, placenta blood and umbilical cord blood during pregnancy. World J Clin Cases. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i28.8340
  60. Aliasgar Manouchehri, Sarima Shokri, Mohadesh Pirhadi et al. (2022). The Effects of Toxic Heavy Metals Lead, Cadmium and Copper on the Epidemiology of Male and Female Infertility. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001427
  61. Canipari R, De Santis L, Cecconi S (2020). Female Fertility and Environmental Pollution. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:10.3390/ijerph17238802
  62. Jenni A. Shearston, Kristen Upson, Milo Gordon et al. (2024). Tampons as a Source of Exposure to Metal(loid)s. Environment International. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.108899
  63. Dobrzyńska MM, Gajowik A, Jankowska-Steifer EA et al. (2025). Nickel Exposure from Food and Levels in Children's Blood and Tissues: Health Implications. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment
  64. Pereira AMPT, Silva LJG, Simoes BDF et al. (2020). Exposure to nickel through commercial premade baby foods: Is there any risk?. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001634
  65. Karen Pendergrass (2026). Nickel as a Catalytic Driver of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Dietary Nickel, Microbial Metallomics, and the Activation of Nickel-Dependent Virulence Pathways in the Preterm Gut. Zenodo Preprint. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18200348
  66. Hopfner T, Wollenberg M, Jager A et al. (2025). The contribution of infant formula to the food survey-based dietary exposure of nine selected elements. Journal of Environmental Exposure Assessment
  67. Meli MA, Desideri D, Sisti D et al. (2024). Chemical characterization of baby food consumed in Italy. PLOS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289126
  68. Gonzalez-Suarez S, Paz-Montelongo S, Niebla-Canelo D et al. (2022). Baby Food Jars as a Dietary Source of Essential (K, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu, Co, Mo, Mn) and Toxic Elements (Al, Cd, Pb, B, Ba, V, Sr, Li, Ni). Applied Sciences
  69. Garuba OD, Anglin JC, Good S et al. (2024). Evaluation of Heavy Metals in Commercial Baby Foods. Archive of Food and Nutritional Science
  70. Rebelytics R&D Inc. (2023). Nickel in Foods: Summary Tables, Unweighted Averages. Rebelytics R&D Inc. (technical report)
  71. Monika Mania, Malgorzata Rebeniak, Oksana Orshulyak et al. (2020). Assessment of Exposure to Nickel Intake with Selected Cereal Grains and Cereal-Based Products. Roczniki Panstwowego Zakladu Higieny. doi:10.32394/rpzh.2020.0142
  72. ★James E. Cassat, Eric P. Skaar (2012). Metal Ion Acquisition in Staphylococcus aureus: Overcoming Nutritional Immunity. Seminars in Immunopathology. doi:10.1007/s00281-011-0294-4
  73. Baker-Austin C, Wright MS, Stepanauskas R et al. (2006). Baker-Austin 2006 — Co-selection of Antibiotic and Metal Resistance. Trends in Microbiology. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.006
  74. Pavlic A, Begic G, Tota M et al. (2021). Bacterial Exposure to Nickel: Influence on Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Orthodontic Archwires and Sensitivity to Antimicrobial Agents. Materials. doi:10.3390/ma14164603
  75. Hu HW, Wang JT, Li J et al. (2016). Hu 2016 — Nickel Contamination and Antibiotic Resistance in Soils. Environmental Science and Technology. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b03383
  76. ★Federica Giambo, Sebastiano Italia, Michele Teodoro et al. (2021). Influence of Toxic Metal Exposure on the Gut Microbiota (Review). World Academy of Sciences Journal
  77. Swierc J, Drzymala S, Wozniak D et al. (2022). The influence of nickel on intestinal microbiota disturbances. Pomeranian Journal of Life Sciences. doi:10.21164/pomjlifesci.810
  78. ★Sweta Ghosh, Syam P. Nukavarpu, Venkatakrishna Rao Jala (2023). Effect of Heavy Metals on Gut Barrier Integrity and Gut Microbiota. Metal ions in Life Sciences (Accepted Manuscript)
  79. Feng P, Yang J, Zhao S et al. (2022). Feng 2022 — Human supplementation with Pediococcus acidilactici GR-1 decreases heavy metal levels through modifying the gut microbiota and metabolome. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes. doi:10.1038/s41522-022-00326-8
  80. ★Hui Duan, Leilei Yu, Fengwei Tian et al. (2020). Gut Microbiota: A Target for Heavy Metal Toxicity and a Probiotic Protective Strategy. Science of the Total Environment. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140429
  81. Runqiu Chen, Huaijun Tu, Tingtao Chen (2022). Potential Application of Living Microorganisms in the Detoxification of Heavy Metals. Foods. doi:10.3390/foods11091017
  82. ★Liliana Anchidin-Norocel, Oana C. Iatcu, Andrei Lobiuc et al. (2025). Heavy Metal-Gut Microbiota Interactions: Probiotics Modulation and Biosensors Detection. Biosensors. doi:10.3390/bios15030188
  83. Servin Yesil Günal, Hikmet Saçmacı, Şerife Saçmacı et al. (2018). Effect of heavy metals and sialic acid in multiple sclerosis. International Research Journal of Public and Environmental Health. doi:10.15739/irjpeh.18.015
  84. . americanou 2022 ibd biomarkers trace metals
  85. ★Kirmizi DA, Baser E, Turksoy VA et al. (2020). Are Heavy Metal Exposure and Trace Element Levels Related to Metabolic and Endocrine Problems in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome?. Biological Trace Element Research. doi:10.1007/s12011-020-02220-w
  86. Manal Abudawood, Hajera Tabassum, Atheer H. Alanazi et al. (2021). Antioxidant Status in Relation to Heavy Metals Induced Oxidative Stress in Patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS). Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-02120-6
  87. Kamila Pokorska-Niewiada, Agnieszka Brodowska, Jacek Brodowski et al. (2022). Levels of Trace Elements in Erythrocytes as Endocrine Disruptors in Obese and Nonobese Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:10.3390/ijerph19137998
  88. Tatarchuk TF, Kosei NV, Vetokh HV et al. (2016). Serum Micro- and Macroelements Levels in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Associated with Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. Reproductive Endocrinology
  89. Irfan S, Rani A, Riaz N et al. (2017). Comparative Evaluation of Heavy Metals in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Healthy Control in Pakistani Population. Iranian Journal of Public Health. doi:10.1002/mnfr.202400571
  90. Arshad M, Riaz N, Bashir R et al. (2023). Role of Some Heavy Metals in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Research Developments in Medicine and Medical Science Vol. 7
  91. Blazewicz A, Grabrucker AM (2023). Metal Profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Crosstalk between Toxic and Essential Metals. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. doi:10.3390/ijms24010308
  92. ★O'Grady K, Grabrucker AM (2025). Metal Dyshomeostasis as a Driver of Gut Pathology in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Neurochemistry. doi:10.1111/jnc.70041
  93. Olamide Ogundare, Emmanuel Obeng-Gyasi (2024). Association of Combined Effect of Metals Exposure and Behavioral Factors on Depressive Symptoms in Women. Toxics. doi:10.3390/toxics12120879
  94. European Parliament, Council of the European Union (2020). Directive (EU) 2020/2184 on the Quality of Water Intended for Human Consumption (Recast). Official Journal of the European Union (L 435/1)
  95. Karen Pendergrass (2026). Heavy Metals in Fertilizers: A Historical Analysis of Contamination Trends (1960-2025). Zenodo Preprint. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18439158
  96. Nazeefa Fatima, Munazza Khan, Muhammad Shuaib Kabeer (2020). Evaluation of Heavy Metals Content in the Canned/Packed Fruit Juices from Local and Imported Origin in Lahore, Pakistan. Journal of Food Safety and Hygiene
  97. Onyeneto T.C., Nwachukwu I.N., Nwogwugwu N.U. (2015). Trace Metals and Contaminants in Commercial Fruit Juices Sold in South Eastern States, Nigeria. Annals of Biological Research
  98. Zahid Mehboob, Abid Ali, Faiza Azmat et al. (2023). Nutritional and Physio Chemical Analysis of Commercial Apple Juices and Natural Apple Juices Available in Pakistan. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology
  99. O. O. Agboola, S. Oyedeji, T. A. Olawoyin et al. (2023). Levels of Heavy Metals and Potential Human Health Risks via Consumption of Leafy Vegetables Purchased in Popular Local Market in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management
  100. ★Street ME, Shulhai A, Petraroli M et al. (2024). Street et al. 2024 — The Impact of Environmental Factors and Contaminants on Thyroid Function and Disease from Fetal to Adult Life. Frontiers in Endocrinology. doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1429884
  101. Zirwas MJ, Molenda MA (2009). Dietary Nickel as a Cause of Systemic Contact Dermatitis. Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology. doi:10.2196/47913
  102. Tuchman M, Silverberg JI, Jacob SE et al. (2015). Nickel contact dermatitis in children. Clin Dermatol. doi:10.1016/j.scib.2017.05.005
  103. Yan Zhang, Jie He, Jiao Jin et al. (2022). Recent advances in the application of metallomics in diagnosis and prognosis of human cancer. Metallomics. doi:10.1007/s10653-023-01737-y
  104. Si Ying Lim, Hiranya Dayal, Song Jie Seah et al. (2023). Plasma metallomics reveals potential biomarkers and insights into the ambivalent associations of elements with acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. doi:10.1016/j.jtemb.2023.127148
  105. ★Abdul Rehman Khan, Fazli Rabbi Awan (2014). Metals in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders. doi:10.1186/2251-6581-13-16
  106. ★Patil RH, Luptakova D, Havlicek V (2021). Infection metallomics for critical care in the post-COVID era. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. doi:10.1002/mas.21755
  107. Niehoff NM, O'Brien KM, Keil AP et al. (2021). Metals and Breast Cancer Risk: A Prospective Study Using Toenail Biomarkers. American Journal of Epidemiology. doi:10.3390/cancers13123045
  108. Karen Pendergrass (2026). Age-Window Metabolic and Toxicokinetic Vulnerability in Vegetable-Based Baby Foods: Separating Developmental Readiness from Toxicant Susceptibility. Zenodo Preprint. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18366816
  109. ★Qinheng Zhu, Boyan Chen, Fu Zhang et al. (2024). Toxic and Essential Metals: Metabolic Interactions with the Gut Microbiota and Health Implications. Frontiers in Nutrition. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115602
  110. Akbari MS, Doran KS, Burcham LR (2022). Metal Homeostasis in Pathogenic Streptococci. Microorganisms. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10081501
  111. Rebelo A, Mourao J, Freitas AR et al. (2021). Diversity of metal and antibiotic resistance genes in Enterococcus spp. from the last century reflects multiple pollution and genetic exchange among phyla from overlapping ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142710
  112. ★Honghong Bao, Yi Wang, Hanlin Xiong et al. (2024). Mechanism of Iron Ion Homeostasis in Intestinal Immunity and Gut Microbiota Remodeling. International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  113. Braud A, Geoffroy V, Hoegy F et al. (2010). Presence of the siderophores pyoverdine and pyochelin in the extracellular medium reduces toxic metal accumulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and increases bacterial metal tolerance. Environmental Microbiology Reports. doi:10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00126.x
  114. ★Zhai Q, Wang G, Zhao J et al. (2016). Oral Administration of Probiotics Inhibits Absorption of the Heavy Metal Cadmium by Protecting the Intestinal Barrier. Appl Environ Microbiol. doi:10.1038/s41420-023-01587-8
  115. Jessica Briffa, Emmanuel Sinagra, Renald Blundell (2020). Heavy Metal Pollution in the Environment and Their Toxicological Effects on Humans. Heliyon. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691
  116. ★Balali-Mood M, Naseri K, Tahergorabi Z et al. (2021). Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Frontiers in Pharmacology. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.643972
  117. Fernandez MdM, Montes-Martinez A, Pineiro-Lamas M et al. (2019). Tobacco consumption and premenstrual syndrome: A case-control study. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218794
  118. Dong Yeop Shin, Sang Min Lee, Yujin Jang et al. (2023). Adverse Human Health Effects of Chromium by Exposure Route: A Comprehensive Review Based on Toxicogenomic Approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. doi:10.3390/ijms24043410
  119. Mengfan Tao, Kanglin Cao, Xinsheng Pu et al. (2024). Cadmium Exposure Induces Changes in Gut Microbial Composition and Metabolic Function in Long-Tailed Dwarf Hamsters, Cricetulus longicaudatus. Ecology and Evolution. doi:10.1002/ece3.11428
  120. Bei Gao, Liang Chi, Ridwan Mahbub et al. (2017). Multi-Omics Reveals that Lead Exposure Disturbs Gut Microbiome Development, Key Metabolites, and Metabolic Pathways. Chemical Research in Toxicology. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00401
  121. Cheng X, Yang B, Zheng J et al. (2021). Cadmium stress triggers significant metabolic reprogramming in Enterococcus faecium CX 2-6. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.10.021
  122. Alquethamy SF, Adams FG, Maharjan R et al. (2021). The Molecular Basis of Acinetobacter baumannii Cadmium Toxicity and Resistance. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. doi:10.1128/AEM.01718-21
  123. Libbey JE, Sanchez JM, Doty DJ et al. (2018). Variations in diet cause alterations in microbiota and metabolites that follow changes in disease severity in a multiple sclerosis model. Beneficial Microbes. doi:10.3920/BM2017.0116
  124. Unknown - file inaccessible due to encoding (Unknown). Evaluation of the Risk from Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) in Italy's Most Consumed Processed Fish Products. Unknown
  125. Altinok Dindar D, Chun B, Palma A et al. (2023). Association between Gut Microbiota and Breast Cancer: Diet as a Potential Modulating Factor. Nutrients
  126. Yang TH, Yuan TH, Hwang YH et al. (2016). Increased inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis patients living where farm soils contain high levels of copper. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2023.04.013
  127. Brad A. Racette, Susan Searles Nielsen, Susan R. Criswell et al. (2017). Dose-Dependent Progression of Parkinsonism in Manganese-Exposed Welders. Neurology. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003533
  128. Katrin Klotz, Wobbeke Weistenhofer, Frauke Neff et al. (2017). The Health Effects of Aluminum Exposure. Deutsches Arzteblatt International. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2017.0653
  129. Paulo Henrique Fonseca do Carmo, Maira Terra Garcia, Livia Mara Alves Figueiredo-Godoi et al. (2023). Metal Nanoparticles to Combat Candida albicans Infections: An Update. Microorganisms. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11010138
  130. Monal M. Kukde, Silpi Basak, Deepak P. Selkar (2019). Effect of Heavy Metal Ions on Candida Isolated from HIV Positive Patients. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
  131. Harris HR, Eke AC, Chavarro JE et al. (2018). Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of endometriosis. Human Reproduction. doi:10.1093/humrep/dey014
  132. Barnard ND, Holtz DN, Schmidt N et al. (2023). Nutrition in the prevention and treatment of endometriosis: A review. Frontiers in Nutrition. doi:10.3389/fnut.2023.1089891
  133. Mazza E, Troiano E, Mazza S et al. (2023). The impact of endometriosis on dietary choices and activities of everyday life: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Nutrition. doi:10.3389/fnut.2023.1273976
  134. Piecuch M, Garbicz J, Waliczek M et al. (2022). I Am the 1 in 10 -- What Should I Eat? A Research Review of Nutrition in Endometriosis. Nutrients. doi:10.3390/nu14245283
  135. Huang Y, Wei Y, Liang F et al. (2024). Exploring the link between dietary zinc intake and endometriosis risk: insights from a cross-sectional analysis of American women. BMC Public Health. doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20433-9
  136. Lei S, Cao Y, Sun J et al. (2018). H2S promotes proliferation of endometrial stromal cells via activating the NF-kB pathway in endometriosis. American Journal of Translational Research. doi:10.1186/s13287-018-1015-x
  137. ★Brylinski L, Kostelecka K, Wolinski F et al. (2025). Effects of Trace Elements on Endocrine Function and Pathogenesis of Thyroid Diseases — A Literature Review. Nutrients. doi:10.3390/nu17030398
  138. ★Puthiyavalappil Rasin, Ashwathi A V, Sabeel M Basheer et al. (2025). Exposure to Cadmium and Its Impacts on Human Health: A Short Review. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances. doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100527
  139. Giuseppe Genchi, Maria Stefania Sinicropi, Graziantonio Lauria et al. (2020). The Effects of Cadmium Toxicity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:10.3390/ijerph17113782
  140. Tarhonska K, Lesicka M, Janasik B et al. (2022). Cadmium and breast cancer - Current state and research gaps in the underlying mechanisms. Toxicology Letters. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2022.03.003
  141. Unknown (Unknown). Microbiome Diet for Endometriosis - Categorized Food Tables. Supplementary Material (no journal identified)
  142. Giorgio Casaburi, Jingjing Wei, Sufyan Kazi et al. (2022). Casaburi 2022 — Formate as a metabolic driver of NEC: integrated metagenomics and targeted metabolomics. Frontiers in Pediatrics. doi:10.3389/fped.2022.893059
  143. Wales AD, Davies RH (2015). Co-Selection of Resistance to Antibiotics, Biocides and Heavy Metals, and Its Relevance to Foodborne Pathogens. Antibiotics. doi:10.3390/antibiotics4040567

Related Articles